How does TRULEO protect itself from the legal and reputational liability of AI 'hallucinations' or missed exculpatory evidence?

Every output generated by TRULEO is fully cited and source-linked. The system does not produce unsupported narrative conclusions. It generates structured intelligence briefings that reference the underlying records directly so investigators can verify every assertion.

Operationally, TRULEO functions as a decision support tool, not a decision maker. Departments are contractually required to maintain a human-in-the-loop review process, and our agreements explicitly state that all investigative conclusions must be independently verified by sworn personnel. The department retains ultimate authority and responsibility for investigative decisions.

From a liability standpoint, TRULEO provides analytical software within the department’s secure environment. We do not make charging decisions, arrest decisions, or evidentiary determinations. Responsibility for investigative outcomes remains with the agency, consistent with how courts treat other investigative software tools.

This structure, including citation backed outputs, mandatory human verification, and clear contractual allocation of responsibility, is how we mitigate both legal and reputational risk.